Dr. Victor E. Alessi
President and CEO, United States Industry Coalition
Dr. Victor E. Alessi is Chief Executive Officer and President of the
United States Industry Coalition, an organization dedicated to
facilitating the commercialization of technologies of the New
Independent States through cooperation with its members. Previously, he
was President of DynMeridian, a subsidiary of DynCorp, specializing in
arms control, nonproliferation, and international security affairs.
Before joining DynMeridian in 1996, Dr. Alessi was the Executive
Assistant to the Director, U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency
(ACDA). Dr. Alessi served as Director of the Office of Arms Control and
Nonproliferation in the Department of Energy prior to his work at ACDA.

"The collapse of the Soviet Union led to the largest
proliferation threat ever faced by our country," Dr. Victor Alessi,
President and CEO of the United States Industry Coalition (USIC), told
his PNNL, Richland audience during a June 15th speech. "We used to
be afraid of a strong Soviet Union," he explained in his
presentation on the role of U.S. National Labs in the nonproliferation
process, sponsored by the Pacific Northwest Center for Global Security
(PNWCGS). "Now we're afraid of a weak Russia."
As the head of the USIC, Dr. Alessi, former President of DynMeridian,
and Executive Assistant to the U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency
(ACDA), works with U.S. businesses, consortiums and universities aiding
Newly Independent States (NIS) to find peaceful, commercial applications
for advanced weapons technologies.
Although the dissolution of the Soviet Union ended the Cold War, the
threat to U.S. and global security increased due to the decrease in the
security of nuclear materials and knowledge. The NIS was left with
nuclear facilities they lacked both the funds and expertise to safely
maintain. "We were hearing about Russian (weapons) scientists who
couldn't put food on the table," said Alessi. This was attracting
employment offers from countries like Iran. Also, Russia's early-warning
defense system was deteriorating due to the inability to replace
monitoring satellites, resulting in a 1995 false alarm that came close
to triggering nuclear retaliation. In order to address the nuclear
threat, "we did so much arms control it made our heads spin,"
said Alessi. He listed the Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty, Threshold
Ban Treaty and Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty, as examples, and
explained that START II only took one week to negotiate, whereas START I
took nine years.
Over the last six years, $153 million of taxpayer money has been
spent on the Initiatives for Proliferation Prevention program (IPP),
funded by the U.S. Department of Energy. The main goals are to reduce
the risk of weapons exports; to improve transparency in the accounting
process, "so that we can have confidence that the Russians have
what they say they have;" and, ultimately, to help Russia downsize
its nuclear weapons complex by finding peaceful applications for its
weapons knowledge.
According to Alessi, the U.S. national labs' participation in the
process has "created a positive legacy." The national labs
help to convert research and development into commercial products,
building up a market demand for the talents of former weapons
scientists, which helps them to remain in Russia, rather than seeking
employment in "dangerous countries." The national labs also
help the NIS to attract industrial partners, reduce the financial and
technical risks of pursuing new technologies, by providing expert
assistance, and enable cost sharing. Furthermore, collaboration between
U.S. and NIS labs and scientists accomplishes much that governments
cannot. For example, it permits laboratory counterparts to form the
close relationships, which Alessi calls "key to the success"
of undertakings such as the Nuclear Cities Initiative, which helps
former Soviet nuclear cities move into the commercial sector and away
from weapons production.
The long-term goals of the IPP program are converting research and
development into commercial products, attracting industrial partners,
and reducing financial and technical risks. Alessi stressed the
importance of finding private sector money to match government funds in
order to maintain support for the program on Capitol Hill. "If you
want to succeed here are the rules…," Alessi told his audience,
" …you must know how to delegate and coordinate between agencies,
progress and efforts must be verifiable, and endeavors must be in the
U.S.' interest if you're going to use taxpayer money."
Identifying challenges to the IPP program, Alessi named the future
relationship between Russia and the United States as one of the greatest
unknowns. He also stated that in spite of current rhetoric, he believes
the program will continue, citing several commercial successes to
support this belief, as well as the program's ability to move products
quickly from inception to the market. "There is no exit strategy
(for success) unless you can commercialize," he stated,
acknowledging another of the program's challenges. "It's tiring (at
times), frustrating… you just go on because you know it's the right
thing to do."